<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11601</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11601</guid>
		<description>Rumors are all over the place. One agency says maximum age will be 45 and will apply to both parents (meaning both parents must be 45 or under). One agency says maximum age will be 50 but if one parent is under that then you are still okay.

And all of the new restrictions are like that. It is ALL speculation and possibilities at this point. Don't get caught up in the details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors are all over the place. One agency says maximum age will be 45 and will apply to both parents (meaning both parents must be 45 or under). One agency says maximum age will be 50 but if one parent is under that then you are still okay.</p>
<p>And all of the new restrictions are like that. It is ALL speculation and possibilities at this point. Don&#8217;t get caught up in the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j4m4w</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11600</link>
		<dc:creator>j4m4w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11600</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I do see the responses to poll where people say they are over 40, discuss thier religious persuasion, etc.  But I don't see anything that shows what the CCAA is rumored to want to see in regard to these factors.  i.e. What is the rumored age limit?  What is the rumored financial status requirement?  What do they want to see regarding religion, health status?  Are these listed somewhere or are the rumors about the specific requirements not clear?  Again, sorry if I'm overlooking something that is posted.  My wife says that is a "man" thing... :^)

Thanks,
j4m4w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I do see the responses to poll where people say they are over 40, discuss thier religious persuasion, etc.  But I don&#8217;t see anything that shows what the CCAA is rumored to want to see in regard to these factors.  i.e. What is the rumored age limit?  What is the rumored financial status requirement?  What do they want to see regarding religion, health status?  Are these listed somewhere or are the rumors about the specific requirements not clear?  Again, sorry if I&#8217;m overlooking something that is posted.  My wife says that is a &#8220;man&#8221; thing&#8230; :^)</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
j4m4w</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skye06</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11561</link>
		<dc:creator>skye06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11561</guid>
		<description>j4m4w, at the top right of this page, under the heading Site Navigation, click on Forum.
Click on General Discussions, and then on Would new regulations knock you out of the program?
In that thread are discussions that include the rumored new guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>j4m4w, at the top right of this page, under the heading Site Navigation, click on Forum.<br />
Click on General Discussions, and then on Would new regulations knock you out of the program?<br />
In that thread are discussions that include the rumored new guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j4m4w</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11560</link>
		<dc:creator>j4m4w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11560</guid>
		<description>I'm probably overlooking it, but I don't see the poll that jj2china mentions that has the rumored new guidelines.  Could someone post the link to it?
Thanks,
j4m4w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m probably overlooking it, but I don&#8217;t see the poll that jj2china mentions that has the rumored new guidelines.  Could someone post the link to it?<br />
Thanks,<br />
j4m4w</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patienceinwaiting</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11464</link>
		<dc:creator>patienceinwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11464</guid>
		<description>wait4hannah: Sounds like we have the same agency...we got the same email.
LID 3/16</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait4hannah: Sounds like we have the same agency&#8230;we got the same email.<br />
LID 3/16</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tresordasie</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11460</link>
		<dc:creator>Tresordasie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11460</guid>
		<description>Jeez, I never even saw this poll. My answer would be no, restrictions would have no effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I never even saw this poll. My answer would be no, restrictions would have no effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait4hannah</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11455</link>
		<dc:creator>wait4hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11455</guid>
		<description>I got an offical email from our big agency yesterday addressing the rumors.  They say that they have talked personally to the CCAA and were told by the CCAA that these rumors are untrue and if any changes are going to take effect the agency would be notified way in advance. 

They also posted that in the past about how dossiers have been grandfathered and newbies getting more time to finish paperw0rk before the changes take affect. 

I don't know what to think abotu this, but our agency really never lets us know anythign about rumours - so this was a biggie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an offical email from our big agency yesterday addressing the rumors.  They say that they have talked personally to the CCAA and were told by the CCAA that these rumors are untrue and if any changes are going to take effect the agency would be notified way in advance. </p>
<p>They also posted that in the past about how dossiers have been grandfathered and newbies getting more time to finish paperw0rk before the changes take affect. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think abotu this, but our agency really never lets us know anythign about rumours - so this was a biggie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11454</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11454</guid>
		<description>Thanks jj2china  - I'd forgotten about so many of them being listed in that thread.

I wouldn't say that all of the possible new restrictions are listed though - I breezed through them as I read the thread so I don't know for sure, but there are so many different lists (each agency claiming to have information seems to have different information), I can't imagine that every single thing made it onto the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks jj2china  - I&#8217;d forgotten about so many of them being listed in that thread.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that all of the possible new restrictions are listed though - I breezed through them as I read the thread so I don&#8217;t know for sure, but there are so many different lists (each agency claiming to have information seems to have different information), I can&#8217;t imagine that every single thing made it onto the thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj2china</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11453</link>
		<dc:creator>jj2china</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11453</guid>
		<description>There is a poll in the forum (see top left of this page) under General Discussions. The responses in that poll have all of the restrictions listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a poll in the forum (see top left of this page) under General Discussions. The responses in that poll have all of the restrictions listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11452</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/29/poll-results/#comment-11452</guid>
		<description>I really don't want to make another list of them. Here is the first post I made on the subject, and I did list some of them on that post.

http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/17/the-new-rules-rumor/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t want to make another list of them. Here is the first post I made on the subject, and I did list some of them on that post.</p>
<p><a href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/17/the-new-rules-rumor/" rel="nofollow">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/08/17/the-new-rules-rumor/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
