<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll through Oct 28th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: QJ</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15206</link>
		<dc:creator>QJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15206</guid>
		<description>I think this is the first time I've seen that 9/29 is larger than our small/medium sized agency's list.  I thought the 30-35 LID's from our agency were the only ones.  I guess we're coming out of the woodwork now.  Well at least there's comfort in numbers, right?

BTW, is there a 9/29/05 only yahoo group or is it the Sept DTC one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen that 9/29 is larger than our small/medium sized agency&#8217;s list.  I thought the 30-35 LID&#8217;s from our agency were the only ones.  I guess we&#8217;re coming out of the woodwork now.  Well at least there&#8217;s comfort in numbers, right?</p>
<p>BTW, is there a 9/29/05 only yahoo group or is it the Sept DTC one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leia</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15204</link>
		<dc:creator>Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15204</guid>
		<description>jmlance --- love the whole zooming thing (-:  Would love for them to zoom right through August and on into September!!

I just finished renewing!  Over and done with ... YaY!
lid 8-24-05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jmlance &#8212; love the whole zooming thing (-:  Would love for them to zoom right through August and on into September!!</p>
<p>I just finished renewing!  Over and done with &#8230; YaY!<br />
lid 8-24-05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmlance</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15203</link>
		<dc:creator>jmlance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15203</guid>
		<description>so hopefully with 8/24 and 9/29 being so heavy, perhaps they will zoom thru the rest of Aug in Oct and zoom thru Sept perhaps (?????) covering all of Sept or at least doing 1/2 in Nov and the other half in Dec.  but i still want a Nov. referral!!!    renewing the 171 is just eating at me right now... inconceivable!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so hopefully with 8/24 and 9/29 being so heavy, perhaps they will zoom thru the rest of Aug in Oct and zoom thru Sept perhaps (?????) covering all of Sept or at least doing 1/2 in Nov and the other half in Dec.  but i still want a Nov. referral!!!    renewing the 171 is just eating at me right now&#8230; inconceivable!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snickerdoodle</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15198</link>
		<dc:creator>snickerdoodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15198</guid>
		<description>Rats, missed the daily poll by 3 days!

Oh well, my turn will come.....

snick
lid Oct 31</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rats, missed the daily poll by 3 days!</p>
<p>Oh well, my turn will come&#8230;..</p>
<p>snick<br />
lid Oct 31</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mclark35</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15195</link>
		<dc:creator>mclark35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15195</guid>
		<description>RQ,
Sorry-I figured out how to see all the results.
Meg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ,<br />
Sorry-I figured out how to see all the results.<br />
Meg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mclark35</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15194</link>
		<dc:creator>mclark35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15194</guid>
		<description>Wow-I am surprised that there are so many LID's for 9/29.  We as well are in this batch, but our DTC was 9/23, so maybe we were one of the last few dossiers thrown into this LID.  I imagine we may see referrals get cut short right before 9/29 b/c it seems like it is such a large group.  The funny thing is, the 9/29'rs yahoo group is fairly small at this point.

RQ-
The only LID's shown on my poll result only shows LID in the column with 9/29 (the column I voted in).  Am I accessing it wrong?
Meg
LID 9/29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow-I am surprised that there are so many LID&#8217;s for 9/29.  We as well are in this batch, but our DTC was 9/23, so maybe we were one of the last few dossiers thrown into this LID.  I imagine we may see referrals get cut short right before 9/29 b/c it seems like it is such a large group.  The funny thing is, the 9/29&#8242;rs yahoo group is fairly small at this point.</p>
<p>RQ-<br />
The only LID&#8217;s shown on my poll result only shows LID in the column with 9/29 (the column I voted in).  Am I accessing it wrong?<br />
Meg<br />
LID 9/29</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitingforpink</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator>waitingforpink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15192</guid>
		<description>Hi jmlance-
I would love to know what happened last fall at ccaa with regards to log in.  Certain dates -- 9/29, 8/24 seem to be so heavily loaded.  Its hard for me to imagine -- did they just let all the files stack up and up and then finally log them all in on that day?  Why????
I feel your pain about dtc to lid -- it took 32 days for me.  Heres hoping they do all of September together for you!!
: ) wfp 8/24/05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jmlance-<br />
I would love to know what happened last fall at ccaa with regards to log in.  Certain dates &#8212; 9/29, 8/24 seem to be so heavily loaded.  Its hard for me to imagine &#8212; did they just let all the files stack up and up and then finally log them all in on that day?  Why????<br />
I feel your pain about dtc to lid &#8212; it took 32 days for me.  Heres hoping they do all of September together for you!!<br />
: ) wfp 8/24/05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmlance</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15189</link>
		<dc:creator>jmlance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15189</guid>
		<description>that is an excellent question, emilyB.  i had the same thought... we are LID 9/29,too. the thing that irks me the most though is we were DTC on 8/24!   sure wish we would have made LID before 9/29... but alas, here we are still waiting and it's completely out of our control!   shucks!   
we have about 5 or 6 families at our agency with the same LID .. at least that's what i know of from people telling everyone about it on our board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is an excellent question, emilyB.  i had the same thought&#8230; we are LID 9/29,too. the thing that irks me the most though is we were DTC on 8/24!   sure wish we would have made LID before 9/29&#8230; but alas, here we are still waiting and it&#8217;s completely out of our control!   shucks!<br />
we have about 5 or 6 families at our agency with the same LID .. at least that&#8217;s what i know of from people telling everyone about it on our board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmilyB</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15180</link>
		<dc:creator>EmilyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15180</guid>
		<description>RQ,

Not surprising, 9/29 is showing up large on the poll. I know that my agency has about 50-100 for that day. I assume that is a large number even for my large China-only agency. Am I correct? With that size group, do you think it will be broken up between orphanages? Do you know how large groups have been handled in the past?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ,</p>
<p>Not surprising, 9/29 is showing up large on the poll. I know that my agency has about 50-100 for that day. I assume that is a large number even for my large China-only agency. Am I correct? With that size group, do you think it will be broken up between orphanages? Do you know how large groups have been handled in the past?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJsMom2Be</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15179</link>
		<dc:creator>EJsMom2Be</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2006/09/26/poll-through-oct-28th/#comment-15179</guid>
		<description>As the poll is beginning to display, it seems to be that 24Aug is a biggie...  I believe that we have approx. 66 families from my agency w/24Aug LIDS.

RQ - what is the average number of referrals per month?...approx. 1400?  I thought I read that somewhere.

Do we know the approx. number of total referrals that were just released in Sept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the poll is beginning to display, it seems to be that 24Aug is a biggie&#8230;  I believe that we have approx. 66 families from my agency w/24Aug LIDS.</p>
<p>RQ - what is the average number of referrals per month?&#8230;approx. 1400?  I thought I read that somewhere.</p>
<p>Do we know the approx. number of total referrals that were just released in Sept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
