<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Europe Referrals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mom to emily</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28614</link>
		<dc:creator>mom to emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28614</guid>
		<description>Congradulation to all of you that are about to see your beautiful little one.

LID
10/17/05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congradulation to all of you that are about to see your beautiful little one.</p>
<p>LID<br />
10/17/05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28511</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28511</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, NumberCruncher&#039;s math doesn&#039;t jive with mine.

Also, I would not advise doing a re-average until they hit the mid-November dates, since the end of September was a &quot;small&quot; period, and the first week of October has nothing at all.

And besides, my average from the other day took into account that they would get to 9/29. So this doesn&#039;t change my previous 2.3 multiplier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, NumberCruncher&#8217;s math doesn&#8217;t jive with mine.</p>
<p>Also, I would not advise doing a re-average until they hit the mid-November dates, since the end of September was a &#8220;small&#8221; period, and the first week of October has nothing at all.</p>
<p>And besides, my average from the other day took into account that they would get to 9/29. So this doesn&#8217;t change my previous 2.3 multiplier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait4hannah</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28510</link>
		<dc:creator>wait4hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28510</guid>
		<description>RQ - 

Is numercruncher&#039;s math right?  Will it be that much of an increase or decrease like willowflower said?

I hope you are right numercruncher :)

SOB!! 

LID 12/20/05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ &#8211; </p>
<p>Is numercruncher&#8217;s math right?  Will it be that much of an increase or decrease like willowflower said?</p>
<p>I hope you are right numercruncher :)</p>
<p>SOB!! </p>
<p>LID 12/20/05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willowflower</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28506</link>
		<dc:creator>willowflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28506</guid>
		<description>numbercruncher,

It is the number of referrals in a batch that count not really the number of days.  If they only got to 9/27 this time around, they aren&#039;t keeping pace with the previous months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>numbercruncher,</p>
<p>It is the number of referrals in a batch that count not really the number of days.  If they only got to 9/27 this time around, they aren&#8217;t keeping pace with the previous months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superrrrr</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28505</link>
		<dc:creator>superrrrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28505</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m from the Netherlands. Our agency received referrals with a LID 12 and 19 september 2005 and 30 SN referrals . I must say they donâ€™t have more LID in september!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m from the Netherlands. Our agency received referrals with a LID 12 and 19 september 2005 and 30 SN referrals . I must say they donâ€™t have more LID in september!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mclark35</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28503</link>
		<dc:creator>mclark35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28503</guid>
		<description>My agency has nothing today.  Hoping for tomorrow
Meg
LID 9/29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My agency has nothing today.  Hoping for tomorrow<br />
Meg<br />
LID 9/29</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DragonMom</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28501</link>
		<dc:creator>DragonMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28501</guid>
		<description>Test post.  


My posts don&#039;t seem to show up all the time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test post.  </p>
<p>My posts don&#8217;t seem to show up all the time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number Cruncher</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28500</link>
		<dc:creator>Number Cruncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28500</guid>
		<description>If the cut-off date of Sept 27 is correct, then this is great news as far as a speed-up goes.  In the 33 days since the last batch of referrals, CCAA cleared off 19 days woth of LID&#039;s.  Thats a ratio of 1.737 calendar days per LID, down from 2.3 a few months ago.  And the moving average of the last five months has decreased for the 7th month in a row, to 2.111.  

So everyone who was counting the days and then multiplying by 2.3 can now multiply by 1.737 instead.  For our LID of February 7/06, the speed-up from 2.3 to 1.737 means late July/07 rather than mid-November/07 for a referral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the cut-off date of Sept 27 is correct, then this is great news as far as a speed-up goes.  In the 33 days since the last batch of referrals, CCAA cleared off 19 days woth of LID&#8217;s.  Thats a ratio of 1.737 calendar days per LID, down from 2.3 a few months ago.  And the moving average of the last five months has decreased for the 7th month in a row, to 2.111.  </p>
<p>So everyone who was counting the days and then multiplying by 2.3 can now multiply by 1.737 instead.  For our LID of February 7/06, the speed-up from 2.3 to 1.737 means late July/07 rather than mid-November/07 for a referral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DragonMom</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28498</link>
		<dc:creator>DragonMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28498</guid>
		<description>Our agency&#039;s update says &quot;no matches have been made yet, we expect that CCAA will undertake matching when they return from break&quot;.


Good thing RQ has the straight info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our agency&#8217;s update says &#8220;no matches have been made yet, we expect that CCAA will undertake matching when they return from break&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good thing RQ has the straight info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinagirl6886</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/comment-page-2/#comment-28499</link>
		<dc:creator>chinagirl6886</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/02/europe-referrals/#comment-28499</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to see those referrals flying in!  Congrats to those who will soon be seeing pictures of your new daughter or son!  And also to those who are one step closer!  SOB (Thanks, RQ for reminding me what that actually stands for over here!  LOL!)

Kathryn
http://journeytoourchild.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see those referrals flying in!  Congrats to those who will soon be seeing pictures of your new daughter or son!  And also to those who are one step closer!  SOB (Thanks, RQ for reminding me what that actually stands for over here!  LOL!)</p>
<p>Kathryn<br />
<a href="http://journeytoourchild.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://journeytoourchild.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

