<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Consulate rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitingtoolong</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29902</link>
		<dc:creator>waitingtoolong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29902</guid>
		<description>Mom2Isabel--
Thank you.  That really does cover it.  So we should be getting an updated I171H before we have to update it again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom2Isabel&#8211;<br />
Thank you.  That really does cover it.  So we should be getting an updated I171H before we have to update it again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cab</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29901</link>
		<dc:creator>cab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29901</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

this is my first entry on this site. Following the CNN story I have to make a comment. Last year in Australia one of our federal politicians made a comment in one of the major newspapers in Sydney regarding her opinion of people adopting internationally and specifically from China, which was, and I am not quoting here, that international adoption was  people in a first world country like Australia plundering the third world for their children. Now this comment illicited outrage from the adoption community, sadly only the adoption community, and hundreds of emails and letters were sent to  the newspaper and this government minister and other ministers across Australia. Not one person received a response from her or her office. No retraction or apology has ever appeared in any form in the Australian media or from the current Australian government. 
 Just thought you all may be interested in the situation down under.

Best wishes,
cab</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>this is my first entry on this site. Following the CNN story I have to make a comment. Last year in Australia one of our federal politicians made a comment in one of the major newspapers in Sydney regarding her opinion of people adopting internationally and specifically from China, which was, and I am not quoting here, that international adoption was  people in a first world country like Australia plundering the third world for their children. Now this comment illicited outrage from the adoption community, sadly only the adoption community, and hundreds of emails and letters were sent to  the newspaper and this government minister and other ministers across Australia. Not one person received a response from her or her office. No retraction or apology has ever appeared in any form in the Australian media or from the current Australian government.<br />
 Just thought you all may be interested in the situation down under.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
cab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom2Isabel</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom2Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29900</guid>
		<description>waitingtoolong-

When you get refingerprinted, USCIS will send you an updated 171-H with the new fingerprint expiration date. My fingerprints expired in October. I got the form back ~ 1 month later. My 171-H expiration was Feb 1, 2007. I waited until the November referrals in hopes that I might not have to redo the 171-H. Unfortunately, I missed the cutoff my 5 days. I leave in 10 days for China. I got my new 171-H about 6 weeks after I applied. 
The local Jacksonville office was not too nice and my agency was about to pull out the big guns and call on the sate senators when it arrived. Turns out my CA is 1/30/07 and I will be leaving on 2/1/07 back to the States but it was cutting it too close.
One suggestion to those of you who decide to redo your prints before redoing the 171-H...DOCUMENT everything! Several people locally here in north Florida have had their fingerprints done and then, months later, when they reapplied for another 171-H, their application was returned because they did NOT enclose the fingerprint fee in the cashier check. 
To avoid that scenario, I wrote a cover letter, explaining that my prints had been redone and attached copies of the appointment letter they had sent me, the cashier&#039;s check and the updated 171-h with the new fingerprint expiration date. I had no problem. As a single, it saved me paying yet another $70. As a couple, it would save $140. Good luck!

Laureen
LID 8/30/05
DOR 12/1/06
Travel 1/18/07-2/1/07
www.babysites.com/sites/laureenmary

[Sorry for the length of this...just thought it was important info that might save others some money.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waitingtoolong-</p>
<p>When you get refingerprinted, USCIS will send you an updated 171-H with the new fingerprint expiration date. My fingerprints expired in October. I got the form back ~ 1 month later. My 171-H expiration was Feb 1, 2007. I waited until the November referrals in hopes that I might not have to redo the 171-H. Unfortunately, I missed the cutoff my 5 days. I leave in 10 days for China. I got my new 171-H about 6 weeks after I applied.<br />
The local Jacksonville office was not too nice and my agency was about to pull out the big guns and call on the sate senators when it arrived. Turns out my CA is 1/30/07 and I will be leaving on 2/1/07 back to the States but it was cutting it too close.<br />
One suggestion to those of you who decide to redo your prints before redoing the 171-H&#8230;DOCUMENT everything! Several people locally here in north Florida have had their fingerprints done and then, months later, when they reapplied for another 171-H, their application was returned because they did NOT enclose the fingerprint fee in the cashier check.<br />
To avoid that scenario, I wrote a cover letter, explaining that my prints had been redone and attached copies of the appointment letter they had sent me, the cashier&#8217;s check and the updated 171-h with the new fingerprint expiration date. I had no problem. As a single, it saved me paying yet another $70. As a couple, it would save $140. Good luck!</p>
<p>Laureen<br />
LID 8/30/05<br />
DOR 12/1/06<br />
Travel 1/18/07-2/1/07<br />
<a href="http://www.babysites.com/sites/laureenmary" rel="nofollow">http://www.babysites.com/sites/laureenmary</a></p>
<p>[Sorry for the length of this...just thought it was important info that might save others some money.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmlance</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29898</link>
		<dc:creator>jmlance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29898</guid>
		<description>bassets,  
 No, your SW should be responsible for sending in your updated homestudy... all you need to send to your CIS office is a copy of your old 171, a letter stating why you need a new one, the check for $545, and the new I-600A -  your SW should send in the updated homestudy after you submit that I-600A!   good luck!   
LID 9/29/05 -  NEXT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bassets,<br />
 No, your SW should be responsible for sending in your updated homestudy&#8230; all you need to send to your CIS office is a copy of your old 171, a letter stating why you need a new one, the check for $545, and the new I-600A &#8211;  your SW should send in the updated homestudy after you submit that I-600A!   good luck!<br />
LID 9/29/05 &#8211;  NEXT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassets</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29896</link>
		<dc:creator>bassets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29896</guid>
		<description>Okay...we re-did our fingerpirints on 11/21/06, 1 year post LID by coincidence, and haven&#039;t received anything back yet. We are updating our Home Study now. Do we have to send in our updated Home Study with the I-600A or can we send it in now??? I thought I had a grip on all of this paperwork, but now nerves are making me second guess myself...AHHHHHH!!

LID 11/21/05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230;we re-did our fingerpirints on 11/21/06, 1 year post LID by coincidence, and haven&#8217;t received anything back yet. We are updating our Home Study now. Do we have to send in our updated Home Study with the I-600A or can we send it in now??? I thought I had a grip on all of this paperwork, but now nerves are making me second guess myself&#8230;AHHHHHH!!</p>
<p>LID 11/21/05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonG</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29895</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29895</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, our China-only agency told us that once we re-do our fingerprints, THEN we should re-file the I-600A - that if we do this, we will not need to be re-fingerprinted a third time. 

We just re-did our fingerprints 2 weeks ago, and are re-filing the I-600A this week.


LID 11-07-2005</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, our China-only agency told us that once we re-do our fingerprints, THEN we should re-file the I-600A &#8211; that if we do this, we will not need to be re-fingerprinted a third time. </p>
<p>We just re-did our fingerprints 2 weeks ago, and are re-filing the I-600A this week.</p>
<p>LID 11-07-2005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam C</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29894</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29894</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t get a consulate appointment until after you receive a travel approval -- which lately has taken 3-5 weeks (or more) after your acceptance letter is returned to the CCAA.

--Pam C
DOR 1/3/07 for DD#2 (LID 9/9/05)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t get a consulate appointment until after you receive a travel approval &#8212; which lately has taken 3-5 weeks (or more) after your acceptance letter is returned to the CCAA.</p>
<p>&#8211;Pam C<br />
DOR 1/3/07 for DD#2 (LID 9/9/05)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katri</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29893</link>
		<dc:creator>Katri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29893</guid>
		<description>Mrs U...That&#039;s what I&#039;m stressing about now too.  I&#039;m afraid they won&#039;t even try to get us a consolate appointment with our documents expiring on the 21st.  Question...after you send in your acceptance of referral to Beiijing - when do they start trying to schedule consolate appointments?  Is it right away?  I&#039;m thinking the USCIS will have my 171-h renewal done....ANYDAY NOW!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs U&#8230;That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m stressing about now too.  I&#8217;m afraid they won&#8217;t even try to get us a consolate appointment with our documents expiring on the 21st.  Question&#8230;after you send in your acceptance of referral to Beiijing &#8211; when do they start trying to schedule consolate appointments?  Is it right away?  I&#8217;m thinking the USCIS will have my 171-h renewal done&#8230;.ANYDAY NOW!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jksweber</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29891</link>
		<dc:creator>jksweber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29891</guid>
		<description>Kangr-
RE:  WI USCIS:  You may let your fingerprints expire and then re-file for your I-171H.  Please be aware that Milw CIS is very slow right now.  We re-filed in October, along with a note saying that we expected a referral soon.  We were referred on Nov. 30, and we are due to travel soon.  We still have no I-171H and are having to deal with Senator Kohl&#039;s office to get this done.  Skip the middle fingerprints, and re-file early!!!!
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kangr-<br />
RE:  WI USCIS:  You may let your fingerprints expire and then re-file for your I-171H.  Please be aware that Milw CIS is very slow right now.  We re-filed in October, along with a note saying that we expected a referral soon.  We were referred on Nov. 30, and we are due to travel soon.  We still have no I-171H and are having to deal with Senator Kohl&#8217;s office to get this done.  Skip the middle fingerprints, and re-file early!!!!<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glassmaker</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-29890</link>
		<dc:creator>glassmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/06/new-consulate-rule/#comment-29890</guid>
		<description>Some offices require a new homestudy and others just require an update.  Florida is my state and they just needed the update with the new I600A application.  Your SW will know for certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some offices require a new homestudy and others just require an update.  Florida is my state and they just needed the update with the new I600A application.  Your SW will know for certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

