<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less Issues this Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitingonsarah</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-30142</link>
		<dc:creator>waitingonsarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-30142</guid>
		<description>We too are with an agency with a LARGE group (34-36). There have been many issues with I-171H&#039;s being renewed.
We got referrals on 12/1 and the acceptances arrived back in china on 12/08. The  wait is excruciating especially as we here of other agencies receiving TAs. Is the size of our group an issue? Would the 171H issue hold everyone up?

RQ, any of your expertise would be greatly appreciated.

D&amp;R
LID 08-26-05
DOR 12-01-06
TA ???
CA ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We too are with an agency with a LARGE group (34-36). There have been many issues with I-171H&#8217;s being renewed.<br />
We got referrals on 12/1 and the acceptances arrived back in china on 12/08. The  wait is excruciating especially as we here of other agencies receiving TAs. Is the size of our group an issue? Would the 171H issue hold everyone up?</p>
<p>RQ, any of your expertise would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>D&amp;R<br />
LID 08-26-05<br />
DOR 12-01-06<br />
TA ???<br />
CA ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireworksinCLT</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-30128</link>
		<dc:creator>FireworksinCLT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-30128</guid>
		<description>Hi RQ,

We&#039;re with a medium, multi-country agency.  We got our referral on Thursday, November 30.  Our papers arrived by FedEx on Friday, December 1.  We were required to have our acceptance letter back to the agency by Monday the 4th in the am.  Letters left that afternoon and were accepted on the morning of the 8th in China.  We felt good about a pretty quick turnaround, but much to my frustration (and that of our entire group of 34 families) we still have no TA.  

Is it possible that each individual SWI or orphanage waits until all letters from all agencies adopting from that particular SWI in a given referral batch arrive before sending TA?  I&#039;m grasping at straws here, but each day we have no TA means another day someone else is raising my daughter...

I&#039;m ready to swim!

~KM in CLT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RQ,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re with a medium, multi-country agency.  We got our referral on Thursday, November 30.  Our papers arrived by FedEx on Friday, December 1.  We were required to have our acceptance letter back to the agency by Monday the 4th in the am.  Letters left that afternoon and were accepted on the morning of the 8th in China.  We felt good about a pretty quick turnaround, but much to my frustration (and that of our entire group of 34 families) we still have no TA.  </p>
<p>Is it possible that each individual SWI or orphanage waits until all letters from all agencies adopting from that particular SWI in a given referral batch arrive before sending TA?  I&#8217;m grasping at straws here, but each day we have no TA means another day someone else is raising my daughter&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ready to swim!</p>
<p>~KM in CLT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pepperan</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-30095</link>
		<dc:creator>pepperan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-30095</guid>
		<description>pj mama-

SF turn around for us was 6 1/2 weeks, and we overnighted both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pj mama-</p>
<p>SF turn around for us was 6 1/2 weeks, and we overnighted both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ragdoll cat</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-30009</link>
		<dc:creator>ragdoll cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-30009</guid>
		<description>PJM - yes, the turnaround for the SF office is about 5 weeks, really quick.  We will refile our 171 at the end of April, since it expires May 30th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJM &#8211; yes, the turnaround for the SF office is about 5 weeks, really quick.  We will refile our 171 at the end of April, since it expires May 30th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Mama</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29997</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29997</guid>
		<description>I think the faster your acceptances go out, the faster TA comes (makes sense it would anyway). I am with a small agency who returns acceptances the day following referrals, and in 2001 got my TA about 7-8 days after referral.  I don&#039;t think size matters although luck may!

PJM
LID 10/26 and harrassing my agency for my HS update so I can send to CIS ASAP.  They say SF is about 5-6 weeks turnaround - anyone have experience with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the faster your acceptances go out, the faster TA comes (makes sense it would anyway). I am with a small agency who returns acceptances the day following referrals, and in 2001 got my TA about 7-8 days after referral.  I don&#8217;t think size matters although luck may!</p>
<p>PJM<br />
LID 10/26 and harrassing my agency for my HS update so I can send to CIS ASAP.  They say SF is about 5-6 weeks turnaround &#8211; anyone have experience with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom2Isabel</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29984</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom2Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29984</guid>
		<description>We had 19 babies from Jiangxi inour December batch. They had to split us up into two groups. We have a whole bunch from Hunan in the 18 -22 month range with this current referral batch.

Laureen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had 19 babies from Jiangxi inour December batch. They had to split us up into two groups. We have a whole bunch from Hunan in the 18 -22 month range with this current referral batch.</p>
<p>Laureen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaylismimi</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29978</link>
		<dc:creator>kaylismimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29978</guid>
		<description>Our group&#039;s 10 are in Jiangxi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our group&#8217;s 10 are in Jiangxi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TotoOz</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29977</link>
		<dc:creator>TotoOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29977</guid>
		<description>Hey RQ,

Here in Oz our TAs went back to China on 12 December, and they still haven&#039;t arrived (thats 12 families). But we&#039;ve been told they&#039;re on their way, so am anxiously waiting!

I noticed all the lovely Hunan girls - cause thats where my girl comes from as well. Our batch were pretty young 8 -13 months old at referral, all from Hunan, tiny SWI. Not sure if that assists in your stats? I noticed that some of the smaller ones are now a bit more active - I think it has to do with some rearranging of who does and submits the paperwork for the babies, as there are big differences from the past referrals from the same place.

And I am so pleased that y&#039;all made that woman eat her words...

Regards Toto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey RQ,</p>
<p>Here in Oz our TAs went back to China on 12 December, and they still haven&#8217;t arrived (thats 12 families). But we&#8217;ve been told they&#8217;re on their way, so am anxiously waiting!</p>
<p>I noticed all the lovely Hunan girls &#8211; cause thats where my girl comes from as well. Our batch were pretty young 8 -13 months old at referral, all from Hunan, tiny SWI. Not sure if that assists in your stats? I noticed that some of the smaller ones are now a bit more active &#8211; I think it has to do with some rearranging of who does and submits the paperwork for the babies, as there are big differences from the past referrals from the same place.</p>
<p>And I am so pleased that y&#8217;all made that woman eat her words&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards Toto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pepperan</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29950</link>
		<dc:creator>pepperan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29950</guid>
		<description>RQ- I&#039;ve noticed than the majority of referrals I&#039;ve seen are from Hunan province. Could just be a coincidence... But I&#039;m hoping this may mean another batch will come soon. That in pure speculation CCAA had a large number of dossiers from Hunan come in and decided to match child dossiers and that soon they will match again with other child dossiers coming in from more provinces. Just a wild guess...one can hope. Have you notice a majority of Hunan referrals in this batch??? I&#039;m wondering. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ- I&#8217;ve noticed than the majority of referrals I&#8217;ve seen are from Hunan province. Could just be a coincidence&#8230; But I&#8217;m hoping this may mean another batch will come soon. That in pure speculation CCAA had a large number of dossiers from Hunan come in and decided to match child dossiers and that soon they will match again with other child dossiers coming in from more provinces. Just a wild guess&#8230;one can hope. Have you notice a majority of Hunan referrals in this batch??? I&#8217;m wondering. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaylismimi</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-29942</link>
		<dc:creator>kaylismimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/01/08/less-issues-this-month/#comment-29942</guid>
		<description>Our agency is a small one, and most of the families in our referral group of ten are located in 500 miles away, so when the referrals arrived at the agency, they had to be translated, then FedEx&#039;d to the families. We received our info on Thursday, December 7 (DOR was 12/01), and all acceptances arrived back at the agency by Monday, December 11. They were sent, as a group, immediately to CCAA. All of the children in the group are in the same orphanage.

Another large agency sent all theirs to CCAA December 5 or 6, got their TAs back two weeks ago and are traveling (several travel groups) between Jan. 11 &amp; 18. Based on that, we were hoping for last week, but it didn&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our agency is a small one, and most of the families in our referral group of ten are located in 500 miles away, so when the referrals arrived at the agency, they had to be translated, then FedEx&#8217;d to the families. We received our info on Thursday, December 7 (DOR was 12/01), and all acceptances arrived back at the agency by Monday, December 11. They were sent, as a group, immediately to CCAA. All of the children in the group are in the same orphanage.</p>
<p>Another large agency sent all theirs to CCAA December 5 or 6, got their TAs back two weeks ago and are traveling (several travel groups) between Jan. 11 &amp; 18. Based on that, we were hoping for last week, but it didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

