<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attrition Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitbabywait</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34984</link>
		<dc:creator>waitbabywait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34984</guid>
		<description>I know the families for babies thing...But still, parents have feelings too. I can&#039;t deny mine. For many of us it&#039;s our personal selfish need that leads us to adoption. I must confess to adopting soley because I want a child. I feel like Holly Hunter in Raising Arizona, if, that is,  I drop my &quot;zen-wait-posture&quot; and really look at myself inside. In the future I see myself adopting for more altruistic reasons, but first I must attain motherhood somehow.
It does seem to me that there ought to be two seperate tracks, to benefit both groups, otherwise the NSN people will be waiting longer and longer and the NSN children will be waiting longer and longer too.
Although it does seems as if NSN referrals are getting younger,
I worry about children age-ing out. (Let alone me age-ing out! lol )
wBw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the families for babies thing&#8230;But still, parents have feelings too. I can&#8217;t deny mine. For many of us it&#8217;s our personal selfish need that leads us to adoption. I must confess to adopting soley because I want a child. I feel like Holly Hunter in Raising Arizona, if, that is,  I drop my &#8220;zen-wait-posture&#8221; and really look at myself inside. In the future I see myself adopting for more altruistic reasons, but first I must attain motherhood somehow.<br />
It does seem to me that there ought to be two seperate tracks, to benefit both groups, otherwise the NSN people will be waiting longer and longer and the NSN children will be waiting longer and longer too.<br />
Although it does seems as if NSN referrals are getting younger,<br />
I worry about children age-ing out. (Let alone me age-ing out! lol )<br />
wBw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postfarm</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34983</link>
		<dc:creator>postfarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34983</guid>
		<description>Oh my...you lost me way back here:

&quot;However, numbers 51 through 100 have an occasional random RED number for 25% of the numbers.&quot; 

Was I the only right brain who needed the numbers actually colored red? LOL!

I did better with the Disney line comparison. Now I&#039;m thinking there should be a FastPass kiosk at CCAA. Just insert your dossier and get a stamp that lets you cut in line!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my&#8230;you lost me way back here:</p>
<p>&#8220;However, numbers 51 through 100 have an occasional random RED number for 25% of the numbers.&#8221; </p>
<p>Was I the only right brain who needed the numbers actually colored red? LOL!</p>
<p>I did better with the Disney line comparison. Now I&#8217;m thinking there should be a FastPass kiosk at CCAA. Just insert your dossier and get a stamp that lets you cut in line!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theups</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34966</link>
		<dc:creator>theups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34966</guid>
		<description>RQ!!! Thanks for making my work my brain first thing in the morning!!! 

His,
Mrs. U
LID 9-12-05
referral 1-4-07
&quot;Gotcha Day&quot; 2-25-07 for Elizabeth
www.makingahouseahome.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ!!! Thanks for making my work my brain first thing in the morning!!! </p>
<p>His,<br />
Mrs. U<br />
LID 9-12-05<br />
referral 1-4-07<br />
&#8220;Gotcha Day&#8221; 2-25-07 for Elizabeth<br />
<a href="http://www.makingahouseahome.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.makingahouseahome.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth146</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34965</link>
		<dc:creator>beth146</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34965</guid>
		<description>This is fascinating RQ - thank you for allowing all of us use our brains!  As this scenario plays out, won&#039;t the NSN children get older and/or potentially &quot;age&quot; out of IA?  Is there an age at which children are no longer eligible to be placed as part of IA unless specifically requested?  It seems I&#039;ve read that there is but can&#039;t recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascinating RQ &#8211; thank you for allowing all of us use our brains!  As this scenario plays out, won&#8217;t the NSN children get older and/or potentially &#8220;age&#8221; out of IA?  Is there an age at which children are no longer eligible to be placed as part of IA unless specifically requested?  It seems I&#8217;ve read that there is but can&#8217;t recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34963</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 11:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34963</guid>
		<description>wbw - the CCAA finds families for babies, not babies for families.

This means that they get SN children&#039;s paperwork handled ASAP so these children can join their families as soon as possible and in some cases can get surgeries and other medical help that much faster.

The NSN paperwork that comes in gets matched with whoever is next in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbw &#8211; the CCAA finds families for babies, not babies for families.</p>
<p>This means that they get SN children&#8217;s paperwork handled ASAP so these children can join their families as soon as possible and in some cases can get surgeries and other medical help that much faster.</p>
<p>The NSN paperwork that comes in gets matched with whoever is next in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitbabywait</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34961</link>
		<dc:creator>waitbabywait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 06:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34961</guid>
		<description>sks~you make a good point i think.
how many should get to have &quot;cuts in line?&quot; in front of each part. nsn group? what&#039;s fair? should it be like expedited, or just anytime a sn child is petitioned for? what isn&#039;t fair? does CCAA worry about that? 
i wonder too, when they talk about paper-ready babies, if they are including sn in that.
just musings laaaate at night...
wBw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sks~you make a good point i think.<br />
how many should get to have &#8220;cuts in line?&#8221; in front of each part. nsn group? what&#8217;s fair? should it be like expedited, or just anytime a sn child is petitioned for? what isn&#8217;t fair? does CCAA worry about that?<br />
i wonder too, when they talk about paper-ready babies, if they are including sn in that.<br />
just musings laaaate at night&#8230;<br />
wBw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waitingforkateybug</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34960</link>
		<dc:creator>waitingforkateybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 03:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34960</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...when will the percieved speed up happen??  NOW would be nice...Yes, NOW is my vote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;when will the percieved speed up happen??  NOW would be nice&#8230;Yes, NOW is my vote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z mommy</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34958</link>
		<dc:creator>z mommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34958</guid>
		<description>sks-- that idea sounds terrible and possible at the same time.  Cheers to being at the end of the line (not)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sks&#8211; that idea sounds terrible and possible at the same time.  Cheers to being at the end of the line (not)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willowflower</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34957</link>
		<dc:creator>willowflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34957</guid>
		<description>I hated stats in college...wish RQ has taught it!  This is fascinating.  Thanks.

How could someone figure what percentage the program will grow or decline by this year?  It would be so interesting to have some real numbers for not only those who are switching to SN, but also for those who don&#039;t qualify and those who aren&#039;t willing to deal with the extended wait times. Will these just offset what might have been a normal percentage increase of dossiers submitted (because the program has been growing each year, I think) or will it cause a dramatic decrease in total dossiers submitted?  Anyone know the percentages by which the number of dossiers submitted has increase year after year (for the past several years)? 

I haven&#039;t asked recently, but a few months ago, our agency said that the number of dossiers submitted were not decreasing (but they also didn&#039;t say they were up by 20% over last year).  They were actually a bit surprised.  I wonder what is happening now that we&#039;ve hit May 1st???Wonder how this all pans out with the possibility that there are just more people adopting internationally now than in the past.  Maybe we won&#039;t see as big a drop in dossiers overall as it seems.

Does this make any sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hated stats in college&#8230;wish RQ has taught it!  This is fascinating.  Thanks.</p>
<p>How could someone figure what percentage the program will grow or decline by this year?  It would be so interesting to have some real numbers for not only those who are switching to SN, but also for those who don&#8217;t qualify and those who aren&#8217;t willing to deal with the extended wait times. Will these just offset what might have been a normal percentage increase of dossiers submitted (because the program has been growing each year, I think) or will it cause a dramatic decrease in total dossiers submitted?  Anyone know the percentages by which the number of dossiers submitted has increase year after year (for the past several years)? </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t asked recently, but a few months ago, our agency said that the number of dossiers submitted were not decreasing (but they also didn&#8217;t say they were up by 20% over last year).  They were actually a bit surprised.  I wonder what is happening now that we&#8217;ve hit May 1st???Wonder how this all pans out with the possibility that there are just more people adopting internationally now than in the past.  Maybe we won&#8217;t see as big a drop in dossiers overall as it seems.</p>
<p>Does this make any sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mezzok</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-34956</link>
		<dc:creator>mezzok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/05/14/attrition-logic/#comment-34956</guid>
		<description>HI RQ:

I am a new member - just found you and I am simply in awe. The service you are providing is priceless!

However, believe it or not, my dh and I don&#039;t even have our dossier in!  CIS lost our docs for 3 months (&quot;they are somewhere in the building, but it is a big building...&quot;) and we moved across country and had to redo everything...we started this in Sept 2005! But we are committed to China for a number of reasons. DH has been there many times on biz and that is our decision. However, we have two amazing boys and delight in them while we go thru this process.

Thanks for providing us with a reality check about the timelines...and I do pray for speed up, speed up, for all of you waiting...especially those waiting to be parents for the first time. Believe me...the wait is worth it!

Mezzo in CO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI RQ:</p>
<p>I am a new member &#8211; just found you and I am simply in awe. The service you are providing is priceless!</p>
<p>However, believe it or not, my dh and I don&#8217;t even have our dossier in!  CIS lost our docs for 3 months (&#8220;they are somewhere in the building, but it is a big building&#8230;&#8221;) and we moved across country and had to redo everything&#8230;we started this in Sept 2005! But we are committed to China for a number of reasons. DH has been there many times on biz and that is our decision. However, we have two amazing boys and delight in them while we go thru this process.</p>
<p>Thanks for providing us with a reality check about the timelines&#8230;and I do pray for speed up, speed up, for all of you waiting&#8230;especially those waiting to be parents for the first time. Believe me&#8230;the wait is worth it!</p>
<p>Mezzo in CO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

