<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where we are with the next batch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: beatr1ce</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43743</link>
		<dc:creator>beatr1ce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43743</guid>
		<description>"I have multiple families with multiple agencies letting me know that their agency has let them know when they need to have this information to them, and they are basing this on the fact that the CCAA is working on January matches."

RQ-Do you think they would match babies that are not paper ready or do you think they match them after they are paper ready?  If so, we will start seeing babies that are much older, right?  Especially if they have already matched January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have multiple families with multiple agencies letting me know that their agency has let them know when they need to have this information to them, and they are basing this on the fact that the CCAA is working on January matches.&#8221;</p>
<p>RQ-Do you think they would match babies that are not paper ready or do you think they match them after they are paper ready?  If so, we will start seeing babies that are much older, right?  Especially if they have already matched January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinasyndrome</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43739</link>
		<dc:creator>chinasyndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43739</guid>
		<description>Please please please please -- Don't put too much stock in what agencies and the CCAA are saying.  Much of the time agencies are only mouthing the words they think the CCAA would approve of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please please &#8212; Don&#8217;t put too much stock in what agencies and the CCAA are saying.  Much of the time agencies are only mouthing the words they think the CCAA would approve of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjk</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43727</link>
		<dc:creator>rjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43727</guid>
		<description>my post isn't going through</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my post isn&#8217;t going through</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjk</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43726</link>
		<dc:creator>rjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43726</guid>
		<description>RUMOR QUEEN:

This is a late comment/question, so I hope you get this...

Anyway, I was just reading an e-mail from my agency this morning and they said that China received an unusually large number of dossiers in the end of Dec. 05 and beginning of Jan. 06.........??????????????????????????

According to the polls here, I thought I understood that the numbers for that time period were LOW.......................Am I confused?  Also, do you think my agency is just talking about only their clients?

I'm concerned about this one as we have a Jan. 13, 2006 LID and I've been gathering from this site that once they referred all of Nov.05 that they'd pick up speed......another words, process more LIDs for the next few batches since "Dec.05, and Jan.06" were low in numbers...............???????????????

I hope I'm clear about what I'm asking b/c  I WOULD LOVE SOME ANSWERS from you or anybody out there who could shed some light on this one.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RUMOR QUEEN:</p>
<p>This is a late comment/question, so I hope you get this&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I was just reading an e-mail from my agency this morning and they said that China received an unusually large number of dossiers in the end of Dec. 05 and beginning of Jan. 06&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;??????????????????????????</p>
<p>According to the polls here, I thought I understood that the numbers for that time period were LOW&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Am I confused?  Also, do you think my agency is just talking about only their clients?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m concerned about this one as we have a Jan. 13, 2006 LID and I&#8217;ve been gathering from this site that once they referred all of Nov.05 that they&#8217;d pick up speed&#8230;&#8230;another words, process more LIDs for the next few batches since &#8220;Dec.05, and Jan.06&#8243; were low in numbers&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;???????????????</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;m clear about what I&#8217;m asking b/c  I WOULD LOVE SOME ANSWERS from you or anybody out there who could shed some light on this one.</p>
<p>Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mamman</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43725</guid>
		<description>Flowerpower, I'm SO very much hoping for that too, but haven't dared to put it in print. I'm so extremely tired of all these disappointments, every month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flowerpower, I&#8217;m SO very much hoping for that too, but haven&#8217;t dared to put it in print. I&#8217;m so extremely tired of all these disappointments, every month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flowerpower</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43724</link>
		<dc:creator>flowerpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43724</guid>
		<description>I am just wondering if they are preparing to send out bigger batches before the Olympics, when the next fiscal year starts.
Grasping at straws here, but it would make sense. It seems things will be down for a while during the Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just wondering if they are preparing to send out bigger batches before the Olympics, when the next fiscal year starts.<br />
Grasping at straws here, but it would make sense. It seems things will be down for a while during the Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skye06</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43723</link>
		<dc:creator>skye06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43723</guid>
		<description>Thanks, RQ.  Good to know about this.  Any ideas about the types of circumstances they'd want to know about?  I'm assuming for any big, important changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, RQ.  Good to know about this.  Any ideas about the types of circumstances they&#8217;d want to know about?  I&#8217;m assuming for any big, important changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: momin2007</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43722</link>
		<dc:creator>momin2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43722</guid>
		<description>I am thinking of the babies that have been matched and then have to wait extra months to have a family! That is not in the best interest of the babies, RQ do you think it means they are literally "matching" that far ahead like people with January LID's already may have their babies matched? Or could it be that the matching room just has those parents files preparing them for match? I know I am grasping at straws, it just seems so sad.
Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking of the babies that have been matched and then have to wait extra months to have a family! That is not in the best interest of the babies, RQ do you think it means they are literally &#8220;matching&#8221; that far ahead like people with January LID&#8217;s already may have their babies matched? Or could it be that the matching room just has those parents files preparing them for match? I know I am grasping at straws, it just seems so sad.<br />
Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43721</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43721</guid>
		<description>skye06 - for a while the word seemed to be that the CCAA wasn't interested in most updates. But now it appears that agencies are being instructed to send updates for certain circumstances, and the CCAA wants them there before the files go to be matched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skye06 - for a while the word seemed to be that the CCAA wasn&#8217;t interested in most updates. But now it appears that agencies are being instructed to send updates for certain circumstances, and the CCAA wants them there before the files go to be matched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skye06</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43720</link>
		<dc:creator>skye06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/2007/09/30/where-we-are-with-the-next-batch/#comment-43720</guid>
		<description>Waiting in Texas, no.  HS updates are only for the US Consulate appointment.  You'll be taking a copy of your update with you to China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waiting in Texas, no.  HS updates are only for the US Consulate appointment.  You&#8217;ll be taking a copy of your update with you to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
