<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amylea</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67048</link>
		<dc:creator>amylea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67048</guid>
		<description>still waiting-
I would love to talk also. I feel like we are just in limbo, not haveing a date to follow. you can email me at amy.phillipy@yahoo.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still waiting-<br />
I would love to talk also. I feel like we are just in limbo, not haveing a date to follow. you can email me at <a href="mailto:amy.phillipy@yahoo.com">amy.phillipy@yahoo.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait4ever</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67041</link>
		<dc:creator>wait4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67041</guid>
		<description>MOLLO, no we have not been moved.  I e-mailed our agancy and no response.  They sent out an e-mail 9-17 that &quot;there are many things to consider&quot;.  I think they are figuring out how much to charge us.  Remember, this is cost them a lot of $$$ in not being able to charge for homestudies anymore.  I have a bad feeling they will charge between $500 and $1000 to make up for future loss.  LID 1-07...what is your LID?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOLLO, no we have not been moved.  I e-mailed our agancy and no response.  They sent out an e-mail 9-17 that &#8220;there are many things to consider&#8221;.  I think they are figuring out how much to charge us.  Remember, this is cost them a lot of $$$ in not being able to charge for homestudies anymore.  I have a bad feeling they will charge between $500 and $1000 to make up for future loss.  LID 1-07&#8230;what is your LID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreaming of Cassie</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67031</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreaming of Cassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67031</guid>
		<description>Thanks RQ for everything!!!

I hope you and your family are having a wonderful week!

~D.O.Cassie
http://www.faithhopeandlove-fhl.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RQ for everything!!!</p>
<p>I hope you and your family are having a wonderful week!</p>
<p>~D.O.Cassie<br />
<a href="http://www.faithhopeandlove-fhl.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.faithhopeandlove-fhl.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollo</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67030</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67030</guid>
		<description>Hi 
Any people out there that still have not been moved from thier non hague to a hague agency? 
We are still waiting.
Molly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Any people out there that still have not been moved from thier non hague to a hague agency?<br />
We are still waiting.<br />
Molly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stillwaiting</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67029</link>
		<dc:creator>stillwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67029</guid>
		<description>Noendinsight---thank you for all of the information.  Amylea--we are prob. with the same agency/same position.  If I could figure out how to e-mail you privately I would--would love to talk.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noendinsight&#8212;thank you for all of the information.  Amylea&#8211;we are prob. with the same agency/same position.  If I could figure out how to e-mail you privately I would&#8211;would love to talk&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67026</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67026</guid>
		<description>The SN program works differently than the NSN program.

You can get an idea of time frames in the forum - there is a room for those in the SN program, and you&#039;ll see some threads stickied to the top that have some charts with statistics.

If you haven&#039;t been to the forum you can get there from the link in the top right hand column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SN program works differently than the NSN program.</p>
<p>You can get an idea of time frames in the forum &#8211; there is a room for those in the SN program, and you&#8217;ll see some threads stickied to the top that have some charts with statistics.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t been to the forum you can get there from the link in the top right hand column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Fong</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67024</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Fong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67024</guid>
		<description>I have a question, I hope this is the right forum to ask.  We are DTC 10.12.09 for a Special Needs Child, so we aren&#039;t waiting for a referral, how does that work?  We have our son, and just waiting to bring him home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question, I hope this is the right forum to ask.  We are DTC 10.12.09 for a Special Needs Child, so we aren&#8217;t waiting for a referral, how does that work?  We have our son, and just waiting to bring him home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RumorQueen</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67022</link>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67022</guid>
		<description>I am aware of two LID groups who were originally told their LID was the 29th, but were recently told their LID was actually the 28th. And, of course, they got a referral in this batch.

As I&#039;ve said before, I think that if the CCAA just needs a little bit more in order make a batch work out (number of babies available to match vs number of families in a log-in-day) that they &quot;change&quot; the LID of a travel group or two in order to keep from having however many babies have to wait an extra month to be adopted.

Sometimes it works the other way, where a family is told &quot;oh, no, your LID is a few days later&quot;. 

They don&#039;t officially split a day, but I believe that they occasionally unofficially split them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am aware of two LID groups who were originally told their LID was the 29th, but were recently told their LID was actually the 28th. And, of course, they got a referral in this batch.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I think that if the CCAA just needs a little bit more in order make a batch work out (number of babies available to match vs number of families in a log-in-day) that they &#8220;change&#8221; the LID of a travel group or two in order to keep from having however many babies have to wait an extra month to be adopted.</p>
<p>Sometimes it works the other way, where a family is told &#8220;oh, no, your LID is a few days later&#8221;. </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t officially split a day, but I believe that they occasionally unofficially split them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassiesmom</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67021</link>
		<dc:creator>cassiesmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67021</guid>
		<description>shamrock-the 29th was not included. There was one family who found out their paperwork had been &quot;stamped incorrectly&quot; and they were included with the 3/27 families, but aside from that, we are aware of no other 3/29 families that received referrals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shamrock-the 29th was not included. There was one family who found out their paperwork had been &#8220;stamped incorrectly&#8221; and they were included with the 3/27 families, but aside from that, we are aware of no other 3/29 families that received referrals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamrock</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2009/10/14/when-31/comment-page-1/#comment-67020</link>
		<dc:creator>shamrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=4614#comment-67020</guid>
		<description>RQ thanks for all the numbers. I see from the Babies post that at least one couple had an LID of the 3/29/06. Is this just random or was the 29th in? 
Thanks so much for everything
shamrock LID 06/02/06</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RQ thanks for all the numbers. I see from the Babies post that at least one couple had an LID of the 3/29/06. Is this just random or was the 29th in?<br />
Thanks so much for everything<br />
shamrock LID 06/02/06</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

