Now I’ve got reports of six agencies saying the 20th and two saying the 22nd. So, I changed it.
In reality, it doesn’t matter since the number of referrals is mostly what I look at. But psychologically I know a lot of people wanted it to be the 22nd.
Don’t forget to keep checking out the Babies! [...]

Two agencies now report that the box has changed to show that LID’s through December 31, 2006 have been reviewed.
I’ve updated the History Page. As you can see from the graphic shown below from that page, these two months don’t even come close to the longest time in Review.

Two agencies are now reporting that the box has changed to show the cut off as January 9th.
Congratulations to those families who made the cut this time! I will continue to make changes to the Babies! post as referrals continue to come in today.
One of the agencies reports that the review information has not changed. [...]

Instead of more communication, it looks like waiting parents are about to get less communication from the CCAA.
When I read it, I inadvertently taught GlitterGirl a phrase I’d just as soon she not heard. It just popped out of my mouth, and I’m usually better at censoring myself than that. But, I read it and [...]

It’s official.
And we don’t just need the polls to tell us how small this batch was. We just have to look at the Babies! post to see that we don’t have as many people getting a referral.
I wish I had answers. I wish someone had answers. But all we have is theories.
As for the [...]

Congrats to all of the families who are now breathing just a little bit easier!