<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>China Adopt Talk &#187; News discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/category/news-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pollution in China</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/27/pollution-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/27/pollution-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is yet another story about pollution in China. One of the many reasons our factories moved overseas is because it is so expensive for companies to be responsible from a pollution standpoint, and that&#8217;s pretty much a requirement in the US, while not so much in countries like China, India, Mexico, and Pakistan. I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/27/pollution-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Censorship</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/18/internet-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/18/internet-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you don&#8217;t go somewhere today that is protesting the upcoming censorship legislation, I&#8217;d like to point you to some trusted sources who can explain it to you: google.com/landing/takeaction/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page mozilla.org/sopa/?WT.mc_id=strike wordpress.org If you go to Google.com today you&#8217;ll see a big black square over their logo. Wikipedia is closed for the day. A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/18/internet-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Dream from 1963</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/16/a-dream-from-1963/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/16/a-dream-from-1963/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racial Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would be 83 years old, if his life hadn&#8217;t been cut short, and if he&#8217;d managed to live that long. What would he say about our world today? How much of his Dream has come to pass? A good deal of it has, but we aren&#8217;t quite there yet. If [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/16/a-dream-from-1963/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Furious &#8212; Attacks on Jon Huntsman</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/06/furious-attacks-on-jon-huntsman/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/06/furious-attacks-on-jon-huntsman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post isn&#8217;t about politics, even though I&#8217;m showing an attack ad. I&#8217;m showing the attack ad because this just goes too far. Way too far. I know that since he&#8217;s a politician and has put himself into the spotlight that he has no legal recourse against this kind of thing&#8230; but I really wish [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2012/01/06/furious-attacks-on-jon-huntsman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ai Weiwei back in the news</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/11/08/ai-weiwei-back-in-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/11/08/ai-weiwei-back-in-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chinese Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems those in charge of PR in China right now are having a hard time understanding public opinion. They are working hard towards keeping something like the recent jasmine uprisings from getting a foothold, but their actions seem to be sparking more and more resistance. A week ago they presented Ai Weiwei with what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/11/08/ai-weiwei-back-in-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Changes in China</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/22/more-changes-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/22/more-changes-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After an intense internet campaign, Chinese officials cancelled the annual Dog Meat Festival in Jinhua. Dog eating in the Jinhua region in Zhejiang province goes all the way back to the Ming Dynasty. Legend has it that one general who was planning to invade Jinhua was constantly getting his troops barked away by dogs in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/22/more-changes-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistani Adoption Story</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/20/pakistani-adoption-story/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/20/pakistani-adoption-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nightmare might be a more apt description than story. You can view it here. I had no idea that adoptions from Pakistan were possible, so this was a bit of an education for me. I did some research and discovered that it is indeed possible &#8212; Christians can adopt babies born to Christian birthparents, while [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/20/pakistani-adoption-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Involuntary Manslaughter</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/17/involuntary-manslaughter/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/17/involuntary-manslaughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jury returned the verdict in about two hours. Am I the only one thinking that handing the case to a jury at 2:30 on a Friday afternoon is a bad idea? At any rate, it would seem that they believed that Nathaniel did it to himself, but felt the Cravers should have been able [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/17/involuntary-manslaughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing Arguments expected today</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/16/closing-arguments-expected-today/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/16/closing-arguments-expected-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Closing arguments are expected today in the trial of Michael and Nanette Craver. A little boy is dead, and that&#8217;s truly tragic. But I&#8217;m not convinced the parents killed him. I am glad I&#8217;m not sitting on the jury, because I don&#8217;t think there is any way to know for sure what happened. I think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/16/closing-arguments-expected-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nathaniel Craver: Expert Testimony</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/15/nathaniel-craver-expert-testimony/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/15/nathaniel-craver-expert-testimony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RumorQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/?p=9055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday&#8217;s testimony just served to cast that much more doubt on the prosecution&#8217;s expert. The York dispatch reports that the defense brought in an expert who disagreed with much of what the prosecution&#8217;s forensic pathologist testified to. The defense&#8217;s pathologist didn&#8217;t find signs of binding, said there were no tests showing Nathaniel was anemic, said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaadopttalk.com/2011/09/15/nathaniel-craver-expert-testimony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

