<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCAA Updates &amp; Referrals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com</link>
	<description>Join the Rumor Queen as she looks for the latest rumors and then analyzes them, trying to figure out what the CCAA will do next.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:33:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Projections - China Adopt Talk</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-58524</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Projections - China Adopt Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-58524</guid>
		<description>[...] changed the History Page to show the latest batch. I&#8217;m still not really sure what to do with that partial 16th batch, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] changed the History Page to show the latest batch. I&#8217;m still not really sure what to do with that partial 16th batch, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-58434</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-58434</guid>
		<description>My agency in Sweden writes the box has changed to Feb 17, 2006. Not good news but at least it&#039;s progress...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My agency in Sweden writes the box has changed to Feb 17, 2006. Not good news but at least it&#8217;s progress&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christinemark2</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-57420</link>
		<dc:creator>christinemark2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-57420</guid>
		<description>Hi,

New to the site, so forgive the question if it&#039;s old news... But when the site says &quot;Asterisks denote CNY dates&quot; below the referral dates table, what does CNY mean?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>New to the site, so forgive the question if it&#8217;s old news&#8230; But when the site says &#8220;Asterisks denote CNY dates&#8221; below the referral dates table, what does CNY mean?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: my3gals</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-56289</link>
		<dc:creator>my3gals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-56289</guid>
		<description>Nickel07
How do you have an LID 12/14/05 that LID already has been issued referrals.  We are into 2006???  Did I miss something??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nickel07<br />
How do you have an LID 12/14/05 that LID already has been issued referrals.  We are into 2006???  Did I miss something??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: china dad 1</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-54816</link>
		<dc:creator>china dad 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-54816</guid>
		<description>theadair6

Vietnam is for all paratical purposes closed for Americans - I cannot speak for other countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theadair6</p>
<p>Vietnam is for all paratical purposes closed for Americans &#8211; I cannot speak for other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diplo</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-53167</link>
		<dc:creator>diplo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-53167</guid>
		<description>I heard this odd story via via of a single Chineas woman of 52 adopting a baby last august in Shenzen, she said there is a special regulation in Shenzhen for single women over the age of 35? Does any one know if this is true of domestic adoptions? If any one knows if its true or false or where I can find it out my email is  diploship@yahoo.com   Thanks

The CCAA don&#039;t reply to this question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard this odd story via via of a single Chineas woman of 52 adopting a baby last august in Shenzen, she said there is a special regulation in Shenzhen for single women over the age of 35? Does any one know if this is true of domestic adoptions? If any one knows if its true or false or where I can find it out my email is  <a href="mailto:diploship@yahoo.com">diploship@yahoo.com</a>   Thanks</p>
<p>The CCAA don&#8217;t reply to this question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luvbugsmom</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-52382</link>
		<dc:creator>luvbugsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-52382</guid>
		<description>mtonkinson, you don&#039;t need to worry about CCAA moving.  The post you read further up was dated July 2006.  This particular page is a frequently referenced page, so gets comments scattered across time.  CCAA already moved.

Joanne, the wait time to referral keeps increasing b/c CCAA only sends out referrals once a month, and does not send out an entire month&#039;s worth of LID&#039;s each time.  In fact, in recent months, they&#039;ve sent out less than a week&#039;s worth of LID&#039;s per month.  The only way the wait time can stay constant for all is if CCAA starts issuing referrals for an entire LID month each calendar month (i.e., all of January 2006 gets referred this month, all of Feb 2006 gets referred next month, etc.)  The only way wait times can decrease is if CCAA sends out more than a month&#039;s worth of LID&#039;s per current calendar month (i.e. all of January 2006 and part of Feb 2006 get referred this month).  Given CCAA&#039;s track record the past couple of years, this is highly unlikely.

Let&#039;s assume CCAA refers about a week&#039;s worth of LID&#039;s per current calendar month (which is actually slightly better than their progress the past few months).  At that pace, it will take about 5 months to get through all of January 2006 LID&#039;s.  So, those LID at the beginning of January 2006 will receive their referrals 5 months sooner than those LID at the end of January 2006, even though their LID&#039;s are only 4 or 5 weeks apart.  The wait grows by a full month for each week into Jan 2006 someone is LID.  

It has nothing to do with new adopters being LID on dates that have already been processed.  It has everything to do with how few LID&#039;s CCAA decides to issue referrals to each month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mtonkinson, you don&#8217;t need to worry about CCAA moving.  The post you read further up was dated July 2006.  This particular page is a frequently referenced page, so gets comments scattered across time.  CCAA already moved.</p>
<p>Joanne, the wait time to referral keeps increasing b/c CCAA only sends out referrals once a month, and does not send out an entire month&#8217;s worth of LID&#8217;s each time.  In fact, in recent months, they&#8217;ve sent out less than a week&#8217;s worth of LID&#8217;s per month.  The only way the wait time can stay constant for all is if CCAA starts issuing referrals for an entire LID month each calendar month (i.e., all of January 2006 gets referred this month, all of Feb 2006 gets referred next month, etc.)  The only way wait times can decrease is if CCAA sends out more than a month&#8217;s worth of LID&#8217;s per current calendar month (i.e. all of January 2006 and part of Feb 2006 get referred this month).  Given CCAA&#8217;s track record the past couple of years, this is highly unlikely.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume CCAA refers about a week&#8217;s worth of LID&#8217;s per current calendar month (which is actually slightly better than their progress the past few months).  At that pace, it will take about 5 months to get through all of January 2006 LID&#8217;s.  So, those LID at the beginning of January 2006 will receive their referrals 5 months sooner than those LID at the end of January 2006, even though their LID&#8217;s are only 4 or 5 weeks apart.  The wait grows by a full month for each week into Jan 2006 someone is LID.  </p>
<p>It has nothing to do with new adopters being LID on dates that have already been processed.  It has everything to do with how few LID&#8217;s CCAA decides to issue referrals to each month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait4ever</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-52379</link>
		<dc:creator>wait4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-52379</guid>
		<description>theadair6
Pleasehave your sister look CAREFULLY into Vietnam!!  Some agencies have closed the program because the wait is sooo long now.  Also, Vietnam has not signed to continue their adoptions and it expires in September.  Have her read lots of web-sites and ask many questions!  I would hate for her to be in the same situation we are in or stuck paying all that $$ for a program that is unstable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theadair6<br />
Pleasehave your sister look CAREFULLY into Vietnam!!  Some agencies have closed the program because the wait is sooo long now.  Also, Vietnam has not signed to continue their adoptions and it expires in September.  Have her read lots of web-sites and ask many questions!  I would hate for her to be in the same situation we are in or stuck paying all that $$ for a program that is unstable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait4ever</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-52378</link>
		<dc:creator>wait4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-52378</guid>
		<description>We are LID 1-17-07
If it goes back to finishing 3 months of referrals per year...wouldn&#039;t it look like this...
Jan. and Feb. &#039;06   ...done in 2008
March, April, May&#039;06...done in &#039;09
June, July, Aug. &#039;06 ....done in 2010
Sept., Oct., Nov.06....done in 2011
Dec.&#039;06, Jan.&#039;07 and Feb&#039;07ect....done in 2012
The referral calculator &quot;predicted&quot; based on current trends, we would be around  Feb. 2012.  This seems right, unless a miracle speed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are LID 1-17-07<br />
If it goes back to finishing 3 months of referrals per year&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t it look like this&#8230;<br />
Jan. and Feb. &#8216;06   &#8230;done in 2008<br />
March, April, May&#8217;06&#8230;done in &#8216;09<br />
June, July, Aug. &#8216;06 &#8230;.done in 2010<br />
Sept., Oct., Nov.06&#8230;.done in 2011<br />
Dec.&#8217;06, Jan.&#8217;07 and Feb&#8217;07ect&#8230;.done in 2012<br />
The referral calculator &#8220;predicted&#8221; based on current trends, we would be around  Feb. 2012.  This seems right, unless a miracle speed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/comment-page-1/#comment-52277</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaadopttalk.com/ccaa-update-and-referral-histories/#comment-52277</guid>
		<description>So hard to know anything with no way of getting 
official advice, but what I can&#039;t understand is why
the waiting time to referral is always rising when
no new adopters can be logged in on dates that
have already been processed. Can anyone answer
this? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So hard to know anything with no way of getting<br />
official advice, but what I can&#8217;t understand is why<br />
the waiting time to referral is always rising when<br />
no new adopters can be logged in on dates that<br />
have already been processed. Can anyone answer<br />
this? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
